When Gaahl (former front vocals of Black Metal band Gorgoroth) came out of his Norwegian Black Metal Log Cabin/Shack; I really thought, mmm... maybe this guy is radical, maybe he has some type of Nietzschean love of man as a representation of the ultimate achievement? Maybe he chooses a life with masculine partner that oozes evolved intellectual consciousness? All of these things I guess I would have opted for if I were to come out of any closet of whatever description but no, I was surprised to find that Gaahl found himself a lovely nancy-boy who bore the mark of young fresh twink fanshionista. Remarkable in its own guise - as everyone rightly is; but I guess my personal fantasy of the exceptional man who has transcended the sexes by loving his mirror image that is beyond himself is left dry.
Sure, each to his/her/its own, I have no authority on anything, but this is just a stupid blog with nothing else going for it so I can speak my mind if I like.
Okay, Gaahl aside (his name mention was really only a marker on the road, not the point of discussion in mention); what I envision in terms of an interdynamic relationship a species can have with itself (essentially as a mark of heightened intelligence and the probability of crazy radical evolution) is that gender explodes not into an obsolete but beyond its dualistic distinctions. Don't get me wrong, I thoroughly appreciate an embrace of primal surge that recognises the wild in oneself and further more the ground-breaking ability to hone such wilderness as a intuitive sharpening of the reason and intellect. What I argue against is an insistence of maintaining a loud voice about what we are and what we are not.
These days, with the gradual desensitising of gender differences, us so called homo sapiens sapiens still bear a mark of stupidity; namely "he or she belongs to that group" (not less found in the minority groups too). Really, there can no longer be space for such diversive delineations if we expect to consider ourselves an intelligent species!
I myself have a very long way to go (many lifetimes still I reckon); but I am bored with the common nativities of using gender language to communicate signs and inclinations; on the flipside, I cannot deny the deep stirrings I have for a curves and soft impressionable touch (my taste differs on various occasions - regarding whatever the suitable season is), but equally I can only remark to the blushing lips of a pouting fluttering women: "Oh, that's cute" and be on my way.
All of this said, what I do recognise in terms of attraction is the inclination toward an intuitive intelligence, meaning that the person in question is more or less balanced in Being. Motivated balance stirs the falling of stars, crackling of night skies, fire from the gods, etc. A humanity that aspires beyond itself is a significant gesture, one that I promote - not in any New Age politic, but one that is thoroughly engaged in itself to work diligently towards its own awakening, out of a self-perpetuated pit of ignorance.
Sure, each to his/her/its own, I have no authority on anything, but this is just a stupid blog with nothing else going for it so I can speak my mind if I like.
Okay, Gaahl aside (his name mention was really only a marker on the road, not the point of discussion in mention); what I envision in terms of an interdynamic relationship a species can have with itself (essentially as a mark of heightened intelligence and the probability of crazy radical evolution) is that gender explodes not into an obsolete but beyond its dualistic distinctions. Don't get me wrong, I thoroughly appreciate an embrace of primal surge that recognises the wild in oneself and further more the ground-breaking ability to hone such wilderness as a intuitive sharpening of the reason and intellect. What I argue against is an insistence of maintaining a loud voice about what we are and what we are not.
These days, with the gradual desensitising of gender differences, us so called homo sapiens sapiens still bear a mark of stupidity; namely "he or she belongs to that group" (not less found in the minority groups too). Really, there can no longer be space for such diversive delineations if we expect to consider ourselves an intelligent species!
I myself have a very long way to go (many lifetimes still I reckon); but I am bored with the common nativities of using gender language to communicate signs and inclinations; on the flipside, I cannot deny the deep stirrings I have for a curves and soft impressionable touch (my taste differs on various occasions - regarding whatever the suitable season is), but equally I can only remark to the blushing lips of a pouting fluttering women: "Oh, that's cute" and be on my way.
All of this said, what I do recognise in terms of attraction is the inclination toward an intuitive intelligence, meaning that the person in question is more or less balanced in Being. Motivated balance stirs the falling of stars, crackling of night skies, fire from the gods, etc. A humanity that aspires beyond itself is a significant gesture, one that I promote - not in any New Age politic, but one that is thoroughly engaged in itself to work diligently towards its own awakening, out of a self-perpetuated pit of ignorance.










